|
Medway Messenger column, 1st August 2003: Disunity In Medway |
|
So Medway doesn’t exist.
All those logos with the blue wavy line representing the river are an illusion.
We must be in The Matrix. Actually,
it just means that the Department of Transport won’t put us on road signs,
despite a campaign by the Council. They want to put Medway on the map for
regeneration and tourism reasons. The mayor and his friends wanted signs such as
‘Medway (Rochester) 2 miles’ to appear on motorways. Am
I alone in thinking the Council was misguided? Effectively,
we are a Borough. Marriage certificates in Medway say that a wedding took place
in ‘the Borough of Medway’. At
a quarter of a million population we are about the size of a London Borough. You
don’t drive into south London and suddenly see signs for ‘Lambeth
(Brixton)’, do you? So
I think the Council campaign was half-baked in its execution. Motorway signs at
the boundary, welcoming you to Medway would make sense. ‘Medway (Chatham) 5
miles’ is plain daft. But
the sentiment was right. A common identity as Medway would be a good thing. I am
one of those who were disappointed when we didn’t win city status at the
Millennium or the Golden Jubilee. I
know many people disagree with me. When it became known that Rochester had lost
its city status due to an administrative error, I saw a woman in Rochester High
Street interviewed on the regional TV news saying, “I want Rochester to be
known as a city, because we don’t want anything to do with Medway.” As
a resident of inner Gillingham I laughed out loud at such snobbery. Especially
when not all of Rochester is special. Had the lady ever made the short trek to
the Delce? At
the other end I have friends in Rainham who wish they were still part of Swale.
They were insulted enough when they were brought into the old Gillingham Borough
Council and told they would be renamed ‘East Gillingham’. They also tend to
think they still live in a village. They haven’t noticed the creeping
concrete. Somewhere
in the middle you get my local councillors objecting to the Council developing
the middle of Chatham as a city centre for Medway, because they fear that
Gillingham High Street will be neglected. (That’s to imply it gets a lot of
attention now. Oh really?) But there is no reason why it should be neglected in
a ‘Medway vision’. To
me, the objections to a focus on Medway boil down to petty jealousies and
rivalries. We still have the mentality of five Medway towns that happen to lie
next to one another. We want to score points off one another. We want to raise
ourselves up by putting our neighbours down. And
we wonder why the facilities of the largest urban conurbation in the South East
outside London are so poor. Our largest regular entertainment venue, the Central
Theatre, holds less than a thousand seats. Other
population centres of a similar size in the country do far better for concert
venues, conference centres, and hôtels than we do. I wonder why. Could it be
they’re not afraid to think of themselves as cities? Plymouth, Stoke, Swansea,
and Wolverhampton all have a similar population to us. They also have a higher
national profile than we do. So
this is just a simple plea from a Christian who believes that the Jesus can
reconcile rivals and warring factions. Let’s quit the silly infighting between
residents of Strood, Rochester, Chatham, Gillingham, and Strood. Let’s pull
together instead. Right now, all of us are the losers. And
anyway – what if God thinks of us as a city?
|
|
Copyright © David D Faulkner, 2006 except where other sources are attributed or noted as inspiration. |